Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 5:22:07 GMT -6
Action that questions mixed crowds at a football game is the responsibility of the Civil Chambers of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, and not those specializing in Consumer Law. Based on this rule of the court's Internal Regulations, the 15th Civil Chamber denied, this Tuesday (27/6), an appeal by the Public Ministry against the injunction that guaranteed the presence of mixed fans in the classics between the four big clubs in Rio. flickr.com In a dispute over collegiate jurisdiction, a decision prevailed that authorized mixed fans in RJ. In his appeal, the MP requested the nullity of the decision and the transfer of the case to one of the Chambers Specialized in Consumer Law.
The panel, however, followed the Buy Phone Number List vote of the appeal's rapporteur, judge Gilberto Clovis Farias Matos, and concluded that the Internal Regulations of the TJ-RJ itself establish the competence of the Civil Chamber to judge the controversy. Furthermore, according to the judge, the matter reported in the first instance refers, primarily, to public security, so much so that the Military Police itself attended the hearings designated by the Fan and Major Events Court. In a monocratic decision handed down on March 3, the judge allowed the sale of tickets for Flamengo and Fluminense fans in the Guanabara Cup final, at the Nilton Santos Stadium, Engenhão. The merits of the appeals from the clubs and the Rio de Janeiro Football Federation will be judged by the 15th Civil Chamber at a later date.
However, she highlighted that “the arbitrated financial compensation cannot represent the unjust enrichment of the victim”, and set the compensation for moral damages at R$ 100 thousand. On the other hand, the amounts entered into the savings account under the heading 'Debito Luz' constituted a failure in the provision of the defendant's banking service, with Caixa owing be ordered to compensate the plaintiff”, concluded the judge, Speaking about the compensation request, the judge states that the cancellation of the show, even though it was the band's original lineup, did not violate any personality rights. The plaintiffs can still appeal the decision.
The panel, however, followed the Buy Phone Number List vote of the appeal's rapporteur, judge Gilberto Clovis Farias Matos, and concluded that the Internal Regulations of the TJ-RJ itself establish the competence of the Civil Chamber to judge the controversy. Furthermore, according to the judge, the matter reported in the first instance refers, primarily, to public security, so much so that the Military Police itself attended the hearings designated by the Fan and Major Events Court. In a monocratic decision handed down on March 3, the judge allowed the sale of tickets for Flamengo and Fluminense fans in the Guanabara Cup final, at the Nilton Santos Stadium, Engenhão. The merits of the appeals from the clubs and the Rio de Janeiro Football Federation will be judged by the 15th Civil Chamber at a later date.
However, she highlighted that “the arbitrated financial compensation cannot represent the unjust enrichment of the victim”, and set the compensation for moral damages at R$ 100 thousand. On the other hand, the amounts entered into the savings account under the heading 'Debito Luz' constituted a failure in the provision of the defendant's banking service, with Caixa owing be ordered to compensate the plaintiff”, concluded the judge, Speaking about the compensation request, the judge states that the cancellation of the show, even though it was the band's original lineup, did not violate any personality rights. The plaintiffs can still appeal the decision.